Document Actions
Attorney Diane Curran files with NRC a request for a ruling on the admissibility of MFP contentions regarding the gross deficiencies of the NRC's Environmental Assessment Supplement
San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (MFP) attorney Diane Curran on October 1, 2007, filed with the NRC a request for a ruling on the admissibility of MFP Contentions regarding the gross deficiencies of the NRC's Environmental Assessment Supplement.
This action is one of many steps MFP has taken in an attempt to force the NRC to follow through on the requirements of the June 2, 2006, ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court in favor of MFP case demanding the NRC meet the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires that the environmental effects of a terrorist attack on the dry cask storage project at Diablo Canyon nuclear plant be taken into account.
The Oct. 1 filing is posted at http://mothersforpeace.org/20071003response/
Also filed was a supporting document by expert witness for MFP, Gordon Thompson at http://mothersforpeace.org/20071003thompson/
This action is one of many steps MFP has taken in an attempt to force the NRC to follow through on the requirements of the June 2, 2006, ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court in favor of MFP case demanding the NRC meet the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires that the environmental effects of a terrorist attack on the dry cask storage project at Diablo Canyon nuclear plant be taken into account.
The Oct. 1 filing is posted at http://mothersforpeace.org/20071003response/
Also filed was a supporting document by expert witness for MFP, Gordon Thompson at http://mothersforpeace.org/20071003thompson/
Public Citizen & MFP Challenge Ineffective NRC Rules on Protection of Nuclear Plants from Terrorists